Last update: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:15 PM
Dear All, I read repeatedly the claim, that Free and Open Source software would be without copyright. This is absolutely not true. To the contrary, OSS has a very strong copyright. Software with no copyright is "Public Domain" Software, which is something very different. The difference to usual "proprietary software" is, that there the user gets nearly no rights (i.e. usually only the right to use the software under certain conditions), but the GPL e.g. gives the user much more rights, i.e. to use, study, modify, and re-distribute the SW, as long as it is released again under the GPL. The GPL copyright gives e.g. the user no right to claim, that it would be his software, or to distribute it under a "closed" license. The copyright for every GPL'ed software is still held by somebody. Linus Torvalds e.g. holds the copyright for the Linux kernel. Since the rights, which the GPL gives the user are so much different from the rights, which one obtains through a common "proprietary SW license", the GPL is often jokingly called "copyleft", but in judicial terms, this is still a copyright. So, I suggest, that when you make a presentation, or write an article, or prepare a project description, be careful not to claim, that OSS would be without copyright! Best Regards, Stefan
<< New Open Source software to help build digital libraries
| Archive Index |
Linux Counter registration to be mandatory for Linux users >>
To facilitate co-ordination regarding the introduction of OSS SW in Vietnam
Subscribe to OSS:
Subscribe | Unsubscribe
Powered by Mojo Mail 2.7.2 SPCopyright © 1999-2003, Justin Simoni.